O que uma adesão à lavagem cerebral revela?/What does adherence to brainwashing reveal?

 A própria natureza do indivíduo, se intelectual ou de outro tipo. Por exemplo, a sexualização intensa de homens gays e bissexuais, promovida pela hegemonia ideológica do ativismo LGBT dentro de suas "comunidades", que exacerba, mas também e, apenas, destaca uma característica mais pronunciada de muitos homens gays e bissexuais. Pois o verdadeiro impacto de uma doutrinação não é necessariamente a introdução emergente de um fenótipo de comportamento, como se pudesse "aparecer do nada", mas uma indução de exacerbação fenotípica, mais especificamente de canalização para uma predisposição subjacente.  

The very nature of the individual, whether intellectual or otherwise. For example, the intense sexualization of gay and bisexual men, promoted by the ideological hegemony of LGBT activism within their "communities," which exacerbates, but also, and only highlights, a more pronounced characteristic of many gay and bisexual men. For the true impact of indoctrination is not necessarily the emergent introduction of a behavioral phenotype, as if it could "appear out of nowhere," but an induction of phenotypic exacerbation, more specifically, the channeling of an underlying predisposition.

The Brazilian media is 1984 "ingSoc"

In all the newspapers: morning, afternoon, evening and dawn. In almost all the television programs, even on the most popular channels. In productions of the seventh art: national and international movies... Also on all the radio stations in the country. Possibly on most YouTube channels. Even those who say they are against this orchestration of the same speeches and the same narratives. Every day, the talk about racism, homophobia, misogyny... Every day, it's the same litany, as if an entire country were reduced to these supposedly well-intentioned abstractions, but with clearly totalitarian intentions and consequences. Every day, Big Brother reminds us of its political and im]moral agenda: Machiavelli's divide and conquer, the bread and circuses of the Roman emperors, as a thousand years ago... Now we have TVs, computers, cell phones, A.I. Everything to continue what they started from the beginning. From sacrifices to the Sun King, from servitude to the clergy and nobility, from endless wars, from artificial divisions, from fictions as certainties. And the cycles are renewed, and the executioners may even be different, but humanity remains the same...

On Gaslighting and the "Left"

Gaslighting is defined as a form of psychological abuse in which information is distorted, selectively omitted to favor the abuser, or simply invented with the intent to make the victim doubt their own memory, perception, and sanity.[2] Cases of gaslighting can range from the abuser simply denying that previous abusive incidents have ever occurred, to the abuser staging bizarre events with the intent to disorient the victim.

Source: Wikipedia

Ideologically bigoted individuals are significantly more likely to engage in fallacious thought patterns, including forms that can be classified as abuse, such as "gaslighting." Those on the "right" and those on the "left" are both more prone to these flaws. However, at least according to my personal experience, both from experience and observation, this type of fallacious thinking and psychologically abusive behavior seems to be more common, even characteristic of being practiced by so-called "left-wing" individuals, perhaps as a kind of retreat strategy in confrontations or debates, especially if there is an "accusatory tone" from the other part who is debating. In a situation like this, the "progressive" fanatic denies "everything", as if he were instructed by his lawyer to deny any participation or cover-up of crimes, in this case, of legitimate conspiracies euphemistically called "cultural or social changes". To deny that ideological indoctrination or "left-wing" brainwashing is taking place in the media, in education and even in the government. To deny that they are imposing their ideological manuals as public policies and that their main objective is not the practice of justice, if they are intrinsically unjust, but of cultural and political hegemony, of absolute power. To deny that so-called "socialist" countries are cruel dictatorships that subject their populations to censorship and misery. To deny that it is supporting or even actively participating in the promotion of ideologies that advocate the political and structural systematization of "reverse" racism, primarily against white populations of European origin, which are literally promoting their extinction (in their most racially purified forms that are very recessive), supporting mass immigration to their countries, self-hatred or collective and historical guilt, denial of the existence of human races and their differences and racial mixing. To deny that it supports or promotes the distortion of basic knowledge (such as the biological reality of human sexuality), made possible by its increasingly totalitarian dominance in academia. To deny that it supports or promotes the censorship of its opponents. To deny that it presents a double moral standard, evidenced by an extreme selectivity of indignation. From denying that it covers up groups and individuals who actively participate in their conspiracies, to creating specific terms that deny that they are promoting massively orchestrated conspiratorial assaults to progressively occupy spaces of power and remodel societies according to their truly shady objectives...

Of course, as was said before, it is not only those on the "left" who practice forms of psychological abuse and fallacious thinking. But the practice of gaslighting, again, seems to be much more characteristic of this "side".

Mais um exemplo de pseudo jornalismo e como seria se fosse um verdadeiro jornalismo/Another example of pseudo journalism and what it would be like if it were true journalism

 "Mulheres negras são vítimas desproporcionais de estupro no Brasil"

PONTO.

Uma notícia que circulou durante um tempo na mídia brasileira. 

Pois se trata de um pseudo jornalismo, forjado partir de uma narrativa ideológica, baseada em uma falácia de evidência suprimida, se não diz qual é o grupo que mais estupra mulheres, incluindo as mulheres negras, por ser "politicamente incorreto"...

Agora, como seria o jornalismo verdadeiro nesse caso

"Mulheres negras são vítimas desproporcionais de estupro no Brasil... E são os homens negros os que mais estupram mulheres negras" (dedução lógica com base no padrão de relacionamentos em que os intrarraciais tendem a ser mais comuns que os interraciais, e potencialmente confirmável pelas estatísticas).

Aí sim, temos a informação completa, os fatos mais relevantes informados, sem distorções ou falácias ideologicamente induzidas, tal como essa, mostrada acima e que visa transmitir ou reforçar uma ideia de vitimização de mulheres negras e omissão do papel de protagonismo dos homens negros nesse processo de vitimização. 

Isso não é racismo ou preconceito, ainda que possa ser usado para se fazer generalizações de causalidade entre raça e comportamento (conceito mais objetivo para o racismo). Até porque não significa que todos os casos de estupro de mulheres negras no Brasil têm como perpetrador um homem negro ou que todos os homens negros são estupradores em potencial. 

"Black women are disproportionate victims of rape in Brazil"

POINT.

A piece of news that circulated for a while in the Brazilian media.

Because it is pseudo journalism, forged from an ideological narrative, based on a fallacy of suppressed evidence, if it does not say which group rapes women the most, including black women, because it is "politically incorrect"...

Now, what would true journalism look like in this case?

"Black women are disproportionate victims of rape in Brazil... And it is black men who rape black women the most" (logical deduction based on the pattern of relationships in which intraracial relationships tend to be more common than interracial relationships, and potentially confirmable by statistics).

So yes, we have complete information, the most relevant facts informed, without ideologically induced distortions or fallacies, such as the one shown above and which aims to convey or reinforce an idea of ​​victimization of black women and omission of the leading role of black men in this victimization process.

This is not racism or prejudice, although it can be used to make generalizations about causality between race and behavior (a more objective concept for racism). Because it does not mean that all cases of rape of black women in Brazil have a black man as the perpetrator or that all black men are potential rapists.